Confession time: I was once so obnoxious in online debates — about theology of all things! — that, a few years later, memories of my ill behavior compelled me to track down and apologize to several people. (And, yes, I know I’ve already confessed this on my blog.)
Why on earth had I been so unpleasant in the first place? I should have known better. After all, my father tried to teach me the art of diplomacy. Even in the case of strong disagreement, he modeled humility and integrity, and those virtues kept him from misrepresenting the beliefs and arguments of others. Those same virtues, and the fact that he was a true gentleman, kept him from viewing someone with a different opinion as an “opponent”, or from denigrating them in any way. Even when I voiced some wackadoodle ideas as a disagreeable teenager and young adult, Daddy responded to my half-baked notions with the utmost charity and respect… far more than I deserved.
In high school, I was excited to discover the names of the rhetorical fallacies that my father had been teaching me about for years. I already knew the term “straw man fallacy”, but now I was learning even more about these faulty ways of thinking. Daddy and I had great fun doing one of my homework assignments together: watching news commentary on TV and identifying the various logical fallacies.
Unfortunately, in the heat of later online debates, almost all of my father’s lessons, as well as his godly example, flew out of my head.
In the years since becoming determined to mend my ways, I’ve had the privilege of interacting — in real life and online — with a number of people who have apparently mastered the art of charitable and respectful disagreement. I’d lost my stomach for heated debate, so this was a welcome contrast to the contentious exchanges of yesteryear. When I repeated a relatively common misunderstanding of another faith, my online acquaintance whose faith we were discussing didn’t retort, “That’s a lie!” or “You are making false statements!” She politely corrected me — and I took her correction to heart. (In case you’re wondering, neither of us converted the other. But at least I understood her religion slightly better, and stopped making the same inadvertently erroneous statements about it.)
When I was discussing a passage of Scripture with someone I know, and we interpreted the passage quite differently, he didn’t shout me down with, “That’s not what that verse means at all! Why are you allowing Satan to deceive you?” Nor did he remind me of his extensive theological education. Instead he explained, quite patiently and charitably I might add, why he believed his interpretation was the correct one. He didn’t take my disagreement as a personal attack. Even if he had, I’m convinced he wouldn’t have abandoned his usual good manners.
It seems as if the more truly knowledgeable someone is, the less they feel the need to cover up what they lack by being strident and argumentative. Those who know their subject well can simply be reasonable, calm, and well-spoken.
But maybe there’s much more to it than that. I’ve been on the receiving end of unpleasantries like “May God rebuke you for your love of deception and deceit” as well as the far more palatable “We will probably never agree, and I know each one of us thinks the other is wrong, but I appreciate our discussions.” I’m not convinced that the vast difference in those two responses is entirely due to education or the lack thereof.
At any rate, I don’t want to wait to be some sort of all-around expert in order to be more like the good examples I’ve cited. Great knowledge is not required in order to become more reasonable, more charitable, more humble, and more kind. By the grace of God, even a college dropout like me can grow in virtue.
Maybe I’m finally starting to learn some of my father’s lessons after all.
An addendum on what does constitute lying:
The most widely accepted definition of lying is the following: “A lie is a statement made by one who does not believe it with the intention that someone else shall be led to believe it” (Isenberg 1973, 248) (cf. “[lying is] making a statement believed to be false, with the intention of getting another to accept it as true” (Primoratz 1984, 54n2)). (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lying-definition/)


